Open Stack

Also:

- As a vendor supporting multiple OpenStack releases is hard ... Or is it?
- Accelerating Open Source Storage with RDMA
- Secured Software Defined Networking for NFV Edge – a Machine learning
approach

On 02/19/2018 08:24 AM, Allison Randal wrote:
> A few more examples, some of which have "Edge" in the title but are
> really more general OpenStack deployment or operations talks:
> 
> - Residual device scrubber for volume in Edge Computing
> - Automated Operation and Maintenance in Edge Computing
> - Toward an analysis of the OpenStack deployment process
> - Bring your IOT device directly to your cloud network
> - Intent Based Policy to Secure Applications Across OpenStack, K8s & BMS
> Environment (Multi-Cloud)
> - Three ARMed OpenStack - Building and Performance Testing OpenStack on ARM
> - The Rise of the Distributed Database
> - Distributed Tracing for continuous improvement of OpenStack-based
> Cloud Services
> - OpenStack OSProfiler Overview: What is it? How does it work?
> - Deploying OpenStack Swift using TripleO
> 
> And maybe also:
> 
> - Deploying to the Edge
> - Deploy Your React Application While Saving Time and Energy
> 
> On 02/18/2018 11:49 PM, Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki) wrote:
>> Here’s one we weren’t sure what to do with…
>>
>>  
>>
>> /Integrating Skydive & Dragonflow and Staying Alive/
>>
>>
>> In the end, we kept it in Community because it does talk about how the
>> community helped the process, but I think it might have better suited in
>> a technical category.
>>
>>  
>>
>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/banners/standard/09_standard_graphic.png  
>>                       
>>
>> 	
>>
>> Gary Kevorkian
>>
>> EVENT MARKETING MANAGER
>>
>> gkevorki at cisco.com <mailto:gkevorki at cisco.com>
>>
>> Tel: +3237912058
>>
>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/twitter-16x16.png
>> <http://wwwin.cisco.com/c/cec/organizations/gmcc/services-tools/twitter.com/GARY805>
>>
>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/webex.png
>> <http://cisco.webex.com/meet/gkevorki> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/sparks.png
>> <https://ciscospark.com/gkevorki> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/jabber.png
>> <http://reachme.cisco.com/call/gkevorki>
>>
>> 		
>>
>> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>>
>> United States
>>
>> Cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com/>
>>
>> ttp://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif
>>
>> 		
>>
>> Think before you print.
>>
>> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
>> use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or
>> disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
>> the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
>>
>> Please click here
>> <http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/legal/terms-sale-software-license-agreement/company-registration-information.html> for
>> Company Registration Information.
>>
>> 	
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From: *Jimmy McArthur <jimmy at openstack.org>
>> *Date: *Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 8:03 PM
>> *To: *"Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki)" <gkevorki at cisco.com>
>> *Cc: *Allison Randal <allison at lohutok.net>,
>> "openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org"
>> <openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] what to do with operator talks?
>>
>>  
>>
>> This is great feedback. I'm going to discuss this with our team and see
>> what we can come up with.  Can y'all provide a few examples?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Jimmy
>>
>>
>>
>>     Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki) <mailto:gkevorki at cisco.com>
>>
>>     February 18, 2018 at 2:18 PM
>>
>>     Operator-centric talks aren’t the only ones. At future Summits, we
>>     may need to embrace the “Grab Bag” track that I’ve seen at other
>>     events. ☺
>>
>>
>>     Gary Kevorkian
>>     EVENT MARKETING MANAGER
>>     gkevorki at cisco.com <mailto:gkevorki at cisco.com>
>>     Tel: +3237912058
>>     <http://wwwin.cisco.com/c/cec/organizations/gmcc/services-tools/twitter.com/GARY805>
>>     <http://wwwin.cisco.com/c/cec/organizations/gmcc/services-tools/twitter.com/GARY805>
>>     <http://cisco.webex.com/meet/gkevorki>
>>     <http://cisco.webex.com/meet/gkevorki>
>>     <https://ciscospark.com/gkevorki> <https://ciscospark.com/gkevorki>
>>     <http://reachme.cisco.com/call/gkevorki>
>>     <http://reachme.cisco.com/call/gkevorki>
>>     Cisco Systems, Inc.
>>     United States
>>     Cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com/> <http://www.cisco.com/>
>>
>>     Think before you print.
>>     This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
>>     sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or
>>     disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
>>     intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
>>     please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of
>>     this message.
>>     Please click here
>>     <http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/legal/terms-sale-software-license-agreement/company-registration-information.html>
>>     <http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/legal/terms-sale-software-license-agreement/company-registration-information.html>
>>     for Company Registration Information.
>>
>>
>>     On 2/18/18, 12:10 PM, "Allison Randal" <allison at lohutok.net>
>>     <mailto:allison at lohutok.net> wrote:
>>
>>     At previous Summits, did we have an Operators track? There seem to be a
>>     large number of talks scattered across the tracks that are basically
>>     just tips, tricks, and best practices for operating an OpenStack cloud.
>>     The track chairs for all the tracks keep trying to kick these talks to
>>     other tracks, but they don't seem to really fit anywhere, so the move
>>     requests get repeatedly rejected.
>>
>>     I don't really have a solution, I'm just making an observation that we
>>     may not be serving our operator audience well if these talks all get
>>     dropped just because they don't seem to match any current tracks.
>>
>>     Allison
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>>     Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>>     <mailto:Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org>
>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>>     Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>>     <mailto:Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org>
>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>>
>>     Allison Randal <mailto:allison at lohutok.net>
>>
>>     February 18, 2018 at 2:10 PM
>>
>>     At previous Summits, did we have an Operators track? There seem to be a
>>     large number of talks scattered across the tracks that are basically
>>     just tips, tricks, and best practices for operating an OpenStack cloud.
>>     The track chairs for all the tracks keep trying to kick these talks to
>>     other tracks, but they don't seem to really fit anywhere, so the move
>>     requests get repeatedly rejected.
>>
>>     I don't really have a solution, I'm just making an observation that we
>>     may not be serving our operator audience well if these talks all get
>>     dropped just because they don't seem to match any current tracks.
>>
>>     Allison
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>>     Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>>     <mailto:Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org>
>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>>
>>
>>