Open Stack

Hi Denys,

You make some great points here. Most of the tracks are quite broad and cover a variety of issues and even audiences. 

I would be very interested to hear how track chairs would potentially break things down (without getting too granular) as we prepare for Barcelona.

Cheers,
Lauren


> On Feb 6, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Denys Makogon <Denys at gigaspaces.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello to All.
> 
> Right now we're in the middle of doing a reviews for submissions. 
> And here's what i see - current track consists of mostly from talks about how to deploy apps within OpenStack.
> 
> I tend to agree that deployment is really significant part of application lifecycle. 
> But when i hear word development i think of designing application by use of 12-factor, micro-services,
> planning backend layer using OpenStack services. In short - doing architectural decisions taking into 
> account all aspects of running application/services in clouds.
> 
> So, here's my suggestion for next summits - split Cloud Application Development in two tracks, 
> one for application architecture decisions (story of success, case studies, etc.) 
> and application deployment track  in order to let speakers decide wisely where their submission fits better.
> 
> Note, this thought are mine, so i more than open for discussions. I just want to make an outcome of talks more solid, 
> more concentrated for attendees.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Denys Makogon
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-track-chairs/attachments/20160207/3410931a/attachment.html>