Open Stack

That's what I did. The script is at:

    https://github.com/rcbau/hacks/blob/master/tools/extra-atcs.py

Michael

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Joe Gordon <joe.gordon0 at gmail.com> wrote:
> If we are using Co-Authored-By tags why not add something to automatically
> look for them in the git logs, I have a hunch other projects will have
> similar cases?
>
> git log --grep=Co-Authored-By --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
> sort | uniq
>
> Gives a quick and dirty list that can be compared to the regular author
> list.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Michael Still <mikal at stillhq.com> wrote:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/119666/ is the first pass, I'll do a
>> catch up closer to the election if its required.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info> wrote:
>> > On 09/05/2014 11:38 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>> >> If I knew when you were going to generate the list of voting ATCs, I
>> >> would be happy to propose a review against extra-atcs which lists all
>> >> the co-authored-bys for nova before then. It would require a TC
>> >> review, but we're actually pretty fast at those for mechanical things.
>> >>
>> >> Michael
>> > This seems to be the easiest/fastest way to accomplish your goal.
>> >
>> > The electoral rolls will be generated after September 26, 2014 05:59
>> > UTC, so please have any and all changes merged to the extra-atcs file
>> > prior to that date/time to ensure those names are included in the
>> > intended projects for the ptl and tc electoral rolls. (The cut off date
>> > for eligibility is the same for both elections.)
>> >
>> > Thanks, let me know if there are any other questions/details I can help
>> > with,
>> > Anita.
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> On 09/05/2014 07:44 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Sep 5, 2014, at 7:09 PM, Michael Still <mikal at stillhq.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I bring this up because Nova has a large example of this in Juno,
>> >>>>> and
>> >>>>> I want to make sure we handle it nicely. If this is the wrong list,
>> >>>>> feel free to cc others.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I'd like to see co-authored-by confer ATC status. Or, I'd like to at
>> >>>>> least see a discussion on if it should.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> This is of interest for me because the ironic nova driver is in the
>> >>>>> process of merging, and we've used co-authored-by to acknowledge the
>> >>>>> contributions of the various authors when we lose the git history
>> >>>>> from
>> >>>>> the remote repository. It think its a nice touch, but I'd also like
>> >>>>> to
>> >>>>> see those authors get ATC.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I thought this was already the case, actually. Absolutely +1 if not.
>> >>>>
>> >>> Jeremy can correct me if I am wrong, but I believe this is the script
>> >>> that he uses to create the electoral roll:
>> >>>
>> >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/tools/atc/email_stats.py
>> >>> This script generates the list of emails I need to use for the poll to
>> >>> add the emails of the electorate.
>> >>>
>> >>> So one option is to offer a patch to extend that script to include
>> >>> co-authored by if we can find a gerrit query that will give results
>> >>> for
>> >>> Co-Authored. (I'm working on it and have come up empty thus far:
>> >>> https://review.openstack.org/Documentation/user-search.html) If we did
>> >>> this we should probably also ensure a governance resolution is merged
>> >>> prior to September 26, 2014 05:59 UTC identifying that the definition
>> >>> of
>> >>> "members who committed a change to a repository" as outlined in the
>> >>> charter is expanded to include co-authored by, just to dot all the i's
>> >>> and cross all the t's.
>> >>>
>> >>> Another option is to submit a list of names of contributors that have
>> >>> status by way of co-authored-by but not by owner of a commit as
>> >>> extra-atc contributors.
>> >>>
>> >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/extra-atcs
>> >>> There is already a mechanism to include names in this file, both by
>> >>> governance decision and the above script. This would require the list
>> >>> of
>> >>> names to be compiled by nova, submitted to the tc and merged to the
>> >>> extra-atc file prior to September 26, 2014 05:59 UTC. There is time
>> >>> for
>> >>> this to happen.
>> >>>
>> >>> My input is based on finding options to make the technical/governance
>> >>> side of this work. I have no opinion on whether this should be
>> >>> undertaken as that decision is up to the tc.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Anita.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rackspace Australia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-TC mailing list
>> OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc
>
>



-- 
Rackspace Australia