Open Stack

I am not sure what to say. It would be nice if people review, if not then
maybe we should just reconsider the stable idea all together...

On 7/15/14, 1:45 PM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" <ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA512
>
>On 15/07/14 11:50, Gary Kotton wrote:
>> Hi, I anyone actually reviewing stable patches. They seem to just
>> be languishing endlessly.
>
>+1. Reviews for stable branches are not actively reviewed, even those
>that unbreak branches. I had a bad experience with havana glance
>backports that fixed sporadic test failures, that were not reviewed by
>anyone from stable cores for months, and I just abandoned those reviews.
>
>How can we push review process? I know everyone is passionate about
>master and new features and developments, but stable branches are what
>is actually consumed by downstream distributors, and they majorly
>define the way our product looks to our users.
>
>Is current stable maintainers' group overflowed with things to do? If
>so, should I consider sending a request to add me to stable maintainers?..
>
>/Ihar
>
>> Thanks Gary
>> 
>> On 7/15/14, 12:47 PM, "Alan Pevec" <apevec at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> - periodic-keystone-python27-havana
>>>>> 
>>>>>http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-keystone-python27-h
>>>>>av
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>ana/7db0b28 : FAILURE in 13m 09s
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Plugin loading from config objects" was merged to
>>>>> keystoneclient master which adds stevedore dependency not
>>>>> present in Havana Keystone test-requirements. Havana
>>>>> global-requirements has stevedore>=0.10 is that enough or we
>>>>> need to bump Havana global to 0.14 ?
>>>> 
>>>> I went back through the stevedore changelog
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://stevedore.readthedoc
>>>>s.
>>>>
>>>> 
>org/en/latest/history.html&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZ
>>>> 
>>>>o8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=9rh16MRiRDYykAoB27f%2BWTV
>>>>XO
>>>>
>>>> 
>YjeOsoHQDSsMxkF60Y%3D%0A&s=d0d83d74dc63b7644d450b796f0d156ff8c21d262f0861
>>>> ba0a9c40410c86c87e ) and ran the tests i have (not all
>>>> committed) and as far as i can tell the 0.10 version will work
>>>> just fine.
>>>> 
>>>> Out of interest though how do we manage this? I can't submit
>>>> to keystoneclient master a version that is not in the global
>>>> requirements.
>>> 
>>> It needs to be added to Keystone Havana deps, keystoneclient
>>> master is checked out directly from git and running in Keystone's
>>> venv.
>>> 
>>> https://review.openstack.org/106974
>>> 
>>> Cheers, Alan
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openstack-stable-maint mailing list
>>> Openstack-stable-maint at lists.openstack.org
>>> 
>>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-mai
>>>nt
>>
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-stable-maint mailing list
>> Openstack-stable-maint at lists.openstack.org
>> 
>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-main
>>t
>>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
>iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTxQY8AAoJEC5aWaUY1u57vp8H/33VESix2Blrq9153xBceriP
>Jzm+GTU/ZftiRUvwkEGTkRNnA3dCWKT3kLkTskqH00KHLsEoTBZje1c0FUyZD367
>4MR+jpQNXBCndzJmYJNhb6tQI79QKLo1nR3H2l+ISSTYYsSizAoyHfD9+VbgmvRu
>7aGtfLX2e9G5vCVSEUd/Gg9d53YKg2cfOukwKiEF1QLoG+S3DWqMnT4MI4ypdk5D
>4+RFZb9auclpJI+OfoB1b5qa3uyDErpMsw8B2gKSoC4qZzVtwUPgBrsz53qYP+iG
>zGLApPpGtgO/WFdl3W/5jgAo3nY20nFYDNvMVuOly1JnSJVEmWmdeIqRdQyaHes=
>=AVJr
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>_______________________________________________
>Openstack-stable-maint mailing list
>Openstack-stable-maint at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint