[Openstack-sigs] [self-healing] Storyboard for tracking SIG actions?

Tim Bell Tim.Bell at cern.ch
Fri Dec 1 17:11:38 UTC 2017

Using a repo name which is consistent with the mailing list tag is also nice, so something like


sig at the beginning would also set the name space cleanly for the future (e.g. sig-scientific, sig-product, …)


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Perez <thingee at gmail.com>
Reply-To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
Date: Friday, 1 December 2017 at 18:01
To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-sigs] [self-healing] Storyboard for tracking SIG actions?

    On 16:43 Dec 01, Adam Spiers wrote:
    > Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
    > >On 2017-11-29 09:23:42 +0000 (+0000), Adam Spiers wrote:
    > >[...]
    > >>that could be solved by changing the approach to require the repo
    > >>to exist, even if it's empty and unused.
    > >[...]
    > >>Currently the wiki is probably good enough, but it certainly
    > >>wouldn't do any harm to have a Git repo, and it's not even
    > >>unlikely that we will need one in the future.
    > >[...]
    > >
    > >This has basically been the conclusion in each past discussion where
    > >the topic has arisen. So, with that out of the way, do you have any
    > >idea what you would want the (for now empty/unused) repository
    > >called? I'm happy to submit the change to create that and the
    > >accompanying SB project for you.
    > That's very kind, thanks!  I guess either "openstack-self-healing" or
    > "openstack-self-healing-sig" should be fine, unless anyone else has
    > any ideas?  In case it's a relevant data point, I was planning to
    > create an #openstack-self-healing IRC channel, so maybe consistency
    > between the names makes sense.
    > Of course, if the "openstack-" prefix is redundant then we
    > can drop that; would this repository be going under the "openstack/"
    > namespace anyway?  I'm assuming my previous suggestion of creating a new
    > "openstack-sig/" namespace probably doesn't make sense, for good
    > reasons I am not yet aware of.
    +1 openstack- prefix is redundant.
    Mike Perez (thingee)

More information about the openstack-sigs mailing list