Open Stack

Thanks Tim, I like that idea!  It would allow all sig repositories to
be viewed via the following URL:

    https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/projects/?filter=%252Fsig-

Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>Using a repo name which is consistent with the mailing list tag is also nice, so something like
>
>sig-self-healing
>
>sig at the beginning would also set the name space cleanly for the future (e.g. sig-scientific, sig-product, …)
>
>Tim
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike Perez <thingee at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
>Date: Friday, 1 December 2017 at 18:01
>To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
>Subject: Re: [Openstack-sigs] [self-healing] Storyboard for tracking SIG actions?
>
>    On 16:43 Dec 01, Adam Spiers wrote:
>    > Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
>    > >On 2017-11-29 09:23:42 +0000 (+0000), Adam Spiers wrote:
>    > >[...]
>    > >>that could be solved by changing the approach to require the repo
>    > >>to exist, even if it's empty and unused.
>    > >[...]
>    > >>Currently the wiki is probably good enough, but it certainly
>    > >>wouldn't do any harm to have a Git repo, and it's not even
>    > >>unlikely that we will need one in the future.
>    > >[...]
>    > >
>    > >This has basically been the conclusion in each past discussion where
>    > >the topic has arisen. So, with that out of the way, do you have any
>    > >idea what you would want the (for now empty/unused) repository
>    > >called? I'm happy to submit the change to create that and the
>    > >accompanying SB project for you.
>    >
>    > That's very kind, thanks!  I guess either "openstack-self-healing" or
>    > "openstack-self-healing-sig" should be fine, unless anyone else has
>    > any ideas?  In case it's a relevant data point, I was planning to
>    > create an #openstack-self-healing IRC channel, so maybe consistency
>    > between the names makes sense.
>    >
>    > Of course, if the "openstack-" prefix is redundant then we
>    > can drop that; would this repository be going under the "openstack/"
>    > namespace anyway?  I'm assuming my previous suggestion of creating a new
>    > "openstack-sig/" namespace probably doesn't make sense, for good
>    > reasons I am not yet aware of.
>
>    +1 openstack- prefix is redundant.
>
>    --
>    Mike Perez (thingee)
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>openstack-sigs mailing list
>openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs