Open Stack

Nowadays,
 I am thinking a lot about ideas what I heard from many people including you.
I am trying to compose something like a plan which can contain most idea and 
 seams good in most view point.
I am trying to anticipate the far future possible scope as well.
Probably lot of idea lost somewhere on the IRC or in a review comment.
Very easy to mishear or miss understood just few words.

I will ask a general question about design and architecture of tempest,
 to start a brain storming.

Only one man cannot see everything, I will need lot of input from everyone.
The plan should be documented and reviewed multiple times.

I would be very happy if I could get input from you as well.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daryl Walleck" <daryl.walleck at RACKSPACE.COM>
> To: "All Things QA." <openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:18:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Tempest core cleanup motions - motion 3 -	remove	dwalleck
> 
> I meant to respond to the initial thread but my intentions got lost in the
> daily shuffle. I completely agree with the sentiment raised here and want to
> make sure Tempest has dedicated contributors whose attention is focused on
> it. I'm certainly not going anywhere and hopefully should be increasing the
> time I spend active in the OpenStack testing community, but I think the
> people most focused on Tempest development should be the ones deciding on
> code reviews.
> 
> Daryl
> ________________________________________
> From: Sean Dague [sean at dague.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:58 AM
> To: openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Tempest core cleanup motions - motion 3 - remove
> dwalleck
> 
> Remembering that openstack-qa-core isn't an honor society, but is a
> working group of people that are actively engaged in the tempest code
> base, providing feedback to new contributors, and helping shepherd
> important features into Tempest. Removal doesn't mean judgement on the
> person, it just means that right now these are not active in driving
> this project through actively reviewing code.
> 
> Remove the following folks from openstack-qa-core (the voting group for
> tempest): dwalleck
> 
> dwalleck's only done 7 reviews in the last 90 days, which is less than
> 10 non core members for the project (it is also < 1 review / 2 weeks).
> His focus is clearly elsewhere. Him not being core doesn't mean we don't
> listen or engage with him, but Tempest and reviewing code in Tempest
> isn't his primary focus right now.
> 
> There was previously an objection from Attila in the last round, which
> is why this is separated out.
> 
> On 05/21/2013 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> > Ok, so the last thread died out a bit, but I still feel we need to move
> > forward. I'm going to break these into 3 separate motions (all will be
> > responses to this email, so the thread should be easy to follow).
> >
> > Voting rules: if you are currently tempest core, please vote +1, 0
> > (abstain), -1 for any of these. If you aren't tempest core, please refrain.
> >
> > We're going to call quorum 3 +1s (which is 1/2 of the currently active
> > tempest core folks) and 0 -1s. Any current tempest core out of the 12
> > (not just the active) that -1s a motion blocks it. Also, I realize that
> > from IBM we're 3 of the active cores, and as extra protection against
> > anyone feeling that one org is too dominant, I'm not going to count it
> > if the only +1s are from IBM, even though that would meet quorum.
> >
> > I also reran the 90 day review numbers this morning for reviews in
> > tempest this morning, they change a little because some chunk of the
> > prior reviews were apparently about 85 days old previously.
> >
> > ** -- tempest-core team member
> > +----------------------+-----------------------------------+
> > |       Reviewer       | Reviews (-2|-1|+1|+2) (+/- ratio) |
> > +----------------------+-----------------------------------+
> > |      sdague **       |      173 (9|48|1|115) (67.1%)     |
> > |      cyeoh-0 **      |      150 (0|48|7|95) (68.0%)      |
> > |     afazekas **      |      146 (1|21|26|98) (84.9%)     |
> > |    david-kranz **    |       90 (0|13|3|74) (85.6%)      |
> > |     treinish **      |       64 (1|24|0|39) (60.9%)      |
> > |       ivan-zhu       |       37 (0|8|29|0) (78.4%)       |
> > |       gfidente       |       35 (0|4|31|0) (88.6%)       |
> > |     jaypipes **      |       34 (0|5|2|27) (85.3%)       |
> > |      donald-ngo      |       18 (0|5|13|0) (72.2%)       |
> > |         jogo         |       17 (0|3|14|0) (82.4%)       |
> > | ravikumar-venkatesan |       17 (0|1|16|0) (94.1%)       |
> > |   andrea-frittoli    |       16 (0|1|15|0) (93.8%)       |
> > |       psedlak        |       13 (0|3|10|0) (76.9%)       |
> > |       adalbas        |       13 (0|1|12|0) (92.3%)       |
> > |        lauria        |       11 (0|0|11|0) (100.0%)      |
> > |       prekarat       |        10 (0|4|6|0) (60.0%)       |
> > |     dwalleck **      |        7 (0|1|4|2) (85.7%)        |
> > |        igawa         |        7 (0|0|7|0) (100.0%)       |
> > |        fungi         |        5 (0|0|5|0) (100.0%)       |
> > |    jerome-gallard    |        4 (0|0|4|0) (100.0%)       |
> > |       dachary        |        3 (0|2|1|0) (33.3%)        |
> > |     rohitkarajgi     |        3 (0|1|2|0) (66.7%)        |
> > |         maru         |        3 (0|1|2|0) (66.7%)        |
> > |       mkollaro       |        3 (0|0|3|0) (100.0%)       |
> > |       maurosr        |        3 (0|0|3|0) (100.0%)       |
> > |        ayoung        |        2 (0|1|1|0) (50.0%)        |
> > |       unknown        |        2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%)       |
> > |     johngarbutt      |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> > |       cboylan        |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> > |  armando-migliaccio  |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> > |        akuno         |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> > |        ymzk37        |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> > |       mpavlase       |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> > |       dperaza        |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> > |       bob-ball       |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> > |        aloga         |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> > +----------------------+-----------------------------------+
> >
> > Previous posting here -
> > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-qa/2013-May/000340.html
> >
> >      -Sean
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
>