Open Stack

I meant to respond to the initial thread but my intentions got lost in the daily shuffle. I completely agree with the sentiment raised here and want to make sure Tempest has dedicated contributors whose attention is focused on it. I'm certainly not going anywhere and hopefully should be increasing the time I spend active in the OpenStack testing community, but I think the people most focused on Tempest development should be the ones deciding on code reviews.

Daryl
________________________________________
From: Sean Dague [sean at dague.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:58 AM
To: openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Tempest core cleanup motions - motion 3 - remove    dwalleck

Remembering that openstack-qa-core isn't an honor society, but is a
working group of people that are actively engaged in the tempest code
base, providing feedback to new contributors, and helping shepherd
important features into Tempest. Removal doesn't mean judgement on the
person, it just means that right now these are not active in driving
this project through actively reviewing code.

Remove the following folks from openstack-qa-core (the voting group for
tempest): dwalleck

dwalleck's only done 7 reviews in the last 90 days, which is less than
10 non core members for the project (it is also < 1 review / 2 weeks).
His focus is clearly elsewhere. Him not being core doesn't mean we don't
listen or engage with him, but Tempest and reviewing code in Tempest
isn't his primary focus right now.

There was previously an objection from Attila in the last round, which
is why this is separated out.

On 05/21/2013 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> Ok, so the last thread died out a bit, but I still feel we need to move
> forward. I'm going to break these into 3 separate motions (all will be
> responses to this email, so the thread should be easy to follow).
>
> Voting rules: if you are currently tempest core, please vote +1, 0
> (abstain), -1 for any of these. If you aren't tempest core, please refrain.
>
> We're going to call quorum 3 +1s (which is 1/2 of the currently active
> tempest core folks) and 0 -1s. Any current tempest core out of the 12
> (not just the active) that -1s a motion blocks it. Also, I realize that
> from IBM we're 3 of the active cores, and as extra protection against
> anyone feeling that one org is too dominant, I'm not going to count it
> if the only +1s are from IBM, even though that would meet quorum.
>
> I also reran the 90 day review numbers this morning for reviews in
> tempest this morning, they change a little because some chunk of the
> prior reviews were apparently about 85 days old previously.
>
> ** -- tempest-core team member
> +----------------------+-----------------------------------+
> |       Reviewer       | Reviews (-2|-1|+1|+2) (+/- ratio) |
> +----------------------+-----------------------------------+
> |      sdague **       |      173 (9|48|1|115) (67.1%)     |
> |      cyeoh-0 **      |      150 (0|48|7|95) (68.0%)      |
> |     afazekas **      |      146 (1|21|26|98) (84.9%)     |
> |    david-kranz **    |       90 (0|13|3|74) (85.6%)      |
> |     treinish **      |       64 (1|24|0|39) (60.9%)      |
> |       ivan-zhu       |       37 (0|8|29|0) (78.4%)       |
> |       gfidente       |       35 (0|4|31|0) (88.6%)       |
> |     jaypipes **      |       34 (0|5|2|27) (85.3%)       |
> |      donald-ngo      |       18 (0|5|13|0) (72.2%)       |
> |         jogo         |       17 (0|3|14|0) (82.4%)       |
> | ravikumar-venkatesan |       17 (0|1|16|0) (94.1%)       |
> |   andrea-frittoli    |       16 (0|1|15|0) (93.8%)       |
> |       psedlak        |       13 (0|3|10|0) (76.9%)       |
> |       adalbas        |       13 (0|1|12|0) (92.3%)       |
> |        lauria        |       11 (0|0|11|0) (100.0%)      |
> |       prekarat       |        10 (0|4|6|0) (60.0%)       |
> |     dwalleck **      |        7 (0|1|4|2) (85.7%)        |
> |        igawa         |        7 (0|0|7|0) (100.0%)       |
> |        fungi         |        5 (0|0|5|0) (100.0%)       |
> |    jerome-gallard    |        4 (0|0|4|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       dachary        |        3 (0|2|1|0) (33.3%)        |
> |     rohitkarajgi     |        3 (0|1|2|0) (66.7%)        |
> |         maru         |        3 (0|1|2|0) (66.7%)        |
> |       mkollaro       |        3 (0|0|3|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       maurosr        |        3 (0|0|3|0) (100.0%)       |
> |        ayoung        |        2 (0|1|1|0) (50.0%)        |
> |       unknown        |        2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%)       |
> |     johngarbutt      |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> |       cboylan        |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> |  armando-migliaccio  |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> |        akuno         |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> |        ymzk37        |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       mpavlase       |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       dperaza        |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       bob-ball       |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |        aloga         |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> +----------------------+-----------------------------------+
>
> Previous posting here -
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-qa/2013-May/000340.html
>
>      -Sean
>
>


--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

_______________________________________________
openstack-qa mailing list
openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa