Open Stack

On Tue, 07 May 2013 15:33:49 -0400
Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:
> As a follow up to our session on Tempest Best Practices at the summit, 
> I'm beginning down the path of the restructure of the Tempest 
> repository, trying to go with a "get a README approved first, then do" 
> approach.
> 
> So here is the first review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28453/
> 
> Please provide your feedback, either in the review, or here on list. And 
> once that is approved and in, I'll go forward with doing some 
> incremental changes. My theory on order is:
> 
> cli
> scenario

I'm implementing the scenario tests now.
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/26403/

This is not a 'README first' approach. But I think there is worth thinking
about secnario tests now.

Any comments are welcome.

Best regards,
Masayuki Igawa


> stress
> 3rdparty
> api
> 
> Just based on level of pain these are. I also think that in general we 
> can slide these in incrementally during normal reviews without being too 
> disruptive.
> 
> Once the directory structure is cleaned up, next up is tags that we'd 
> like to standardize on, which will also let you run tests just for 
> particular components.
> 
> 	-Sean
> 
> -- 
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa