[openstack-qa] Is tempest must be able to operate without identity admin privileges?

Attila Fazekas afazekas at redhat.com
Sat Jun 8 13:03:47 UTC 2013


Do we want parallel execution in this cases ?
- obviously yes
- nice to have
- who cares

Can we expect larger quota than the default 10 in this case ?
- never
- usually
- always


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net>
> To: "All Things QA." <openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org>
> Cc: "Attila Fazekas" <afazekas at redhat.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2013 1:49:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Is tempest must be able to operate without identity admin privileges?
> 
> On 06/08/2013 03:06 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In modeling viewpoint keeping the ability to run tempest
> > without identity admin credentials is not easy.
> >
> > The demo and alt_demo user is still in the config to maintain the ability,
> > to run tempest against a cloud where you do not know the identity admin
> > credentials.
> >
> > I would like to know, is it real use case for anyone ?
> >
> > Without these users you lose the ability to run tempest against any cloud
> > where you do not know the admin credentials.
> >
> > The benefits of removing these can give you:
> >   - simpler model
> >   - better role based test suite
> 
> Yes, it is a real use case, we can't remove that.
> 
> 	-Sean
> 
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
> 



More information about the openstack-qa mailing list