Open Stack

On 06/08/2013 09:03 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
> Do we want parallel execution in this cases ?
> - obviously yes
> - nice to have
> - who cares

obviously yes/must have

> Can we expect larger quota than the default 10 in this case ?
> - never
> - usually
> - always

always. I believe that if we have specific quota needs from a cloud
against which refstack runs, it's not unreasonable. It would be good to
have an understanding at some point of needed quota

> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net>
>> To: "All Things QA." <openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org>
>> Cc: "Attila Fazekas" <afazekas at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2013 1:49:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Is tempest must be able to operate without identity admin privileges?
>>
>> On 06/08/2013 03:06 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> In modeling viewpoint keeping the ability to run tempest
>>> without identity admin credentials is not easy.
>>>
>>> The demo and alt_demo user is still in the config to maintain the ability,
>>> to run tempest against a cloud where you do not know the identity admin
>>> credentials.
>>>
>>> I would like to know, is it real use case for anyone ?
>>>
>>> Without these users you lose the ability to run tempest against any cloud
>>> where you do not know the admin credentials.
>>>
>>> The benefits of removing these can give you:
>>>   - simpler model
>>>   - better role based test suite
>>
>> Yes, it is a real use case, we can't remove that.
>>
>> 	-Sean
>>
>> --
>> Sean Dague
>> http://dague.net
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
>