Open Stack

On 07/09/2013 05:19 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> Now that QA is an official OpenStack Program we need both a PTL and Program description.
> My previous suggestion is we handle the PTL part first. That seemed to be generally agreed
> upon, with the process being that qa-core members are the voters for this.
> 
> So I suggest that we open up the PTL process with nominations, with the hopes of getting
> all nominations by Thursday's QA meeting. If there are multiple nominations we'll organize
> a vote. If not it will just be consensus based.
> 
> I think most folks are around this week, so hopefully this is fine. Realize what we are
> voting on is the QA PTL for Havana, we'll be doing this again at every release boundary so
> again in Oct for Icehouse, April for J, etc, etc.
> 
> ....
> 
> And with that, I'd like to nominate myself for QA PTL for Havana. Over the past couple of
> cycles I've been focused on the QA team process, to get us tracking towards a release a
> little bit better, restructuring tempest so that it's clearer from a contribution
> perspective, and lots of reviews. I've also done a lot of work on non Tempest QA efforts
> like Grenade and the Devstack gate, the rechecks page
> (http://status.openstack.org/rechecks/).

> 
> I'm currently focused on new tooling to make it easier to find and correlate errors in the
> OpenStack gate, as well as be able to get us to a point of enforcing that we don't have
> stack traces in successful runs.

I'm not "core" here. But, it's a no-brainer, a gazillion+1.

> 
>     -Sean
> 


-- 
/kashyap