Open Stack

+1 for Sean from me.

On 07/09/2013 01:41 PM, David Kranz wrote:
> +1 for Sean
>
> On 07/09/2013 07:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> Now that QA is an official OpenStack Program we need both a PTL and
>> Program description. My previous suggestion is we handle the PTL part
>> first. That seemed to be generally agreed upon, with the process being
>> that qa-core members are the voters for this.
>>
>> So I suggest that we open up the PTL process with nominations, with
>> the hopes of getting all nominations by Thursday's QA meeting. If
>> there are multiple nominations we'll organize a vote. If not it will
>> just be consensus based.
>>
>> I think most folks are around this week, so hopefully this is fine.
>> Realize what we are voting on is the QA PTL for Havana, we'll be doing
>> this again at every release boundary so again in Oct for Icehouse,
>> April for J, etc, etc.
>>
>> ....
>>
>> And with that, I'd like to nominate myself for QA PTL for Havana. Over
>> the past couple of cycles I've been focused on the QA team process, to
>> get us tracking towards a release a little bit better, restructuring
>> tempest so that it's clearer from a contribution perspective, and lots
>> of reviews. I've also done a lot of work on non Tempest QA efforts
>> like Grenade and the Devstack gate, the rechecks page
>> (http://status.openstack.org/rechecks/).
>>
>> I'm currently focused on new tooling to make it easier to find and
>> correlate errors in the OpenStack gate, as well as be able to get us
>> to a point of enforcing that we don't have stack traces in successful
>> runs.
>>
>>     -Sean
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa