[openstack-qa] PTL Nomination / Process - throwing my hat in the ring
David Kranz
dkranz at redhat.com
Tue Jul 9 17:41:30 UTC 2013
+1 for Sean
On 07/09/2013 07:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> Now that QA is an official OpenStack Program we need both a PTL and
> Program description. My previous suggestion is we handle the PTL part
> first. That seemed to be generally agreed upon, with the process being
> that qa-core members are the voters for this.
>
> So I suggest that we open up the PTL process with nominations, with
> the hopes of getting all nominations by Thursday's QA meeting. If
> there are multiple nominations we'll organize a vote. If not it will
> just be consensus based.
>
> I think most folks are around this week, so hopefully this is fine.
> Realize what we are voting on is the QA PTL for Havana, we'll be doing
> this again at every release boundary so again in Oct for Icehouse,
> April for J, etc, etc.
>
> ....
>
> And with that, I'd like to nominate myself for QA PTL for Havana. Over
> the past couple of cycles I've been focused on the QA team process, to
> get us tracking towards a release a little bit better, restructuring
> tempest so that it's clearer from a contribution perspective, and lots
> of reviews. I've also done a lot of work on non Tempest QA efforts
> like Grenade and the Devstack gate, the rechecks page
> (http://status.openstack.org/rechecks/).
>
> I'm currently focused on new tooling to make it easier to find and
> correlate errors in the OpenStack gate, as well as be able to get us
> to a point of enforcing that we don't have stack traces in successful
> runs.
>
> -Sean
>
More information about the openstack-qa
mailing list