[openstack-qa] Tempest Coverage Analysis and Gaps in Compute Tests
Yaniv Kaul
ykaul at redhat.com
Wed Jan 30 07:21:01 UTC 2013
On 30/01/13 00:54, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've started working on an analysis of the coverage reports generated by the
> periodic Jenkins jobs:
>
> https://jenkins.openstack.org/job/periodic-tempest-devstack-coverage-vm-full/
>
> I wanted to see how good a job tempest is doing for covering the Nova API code.
> Right now we've got some gaps in what is being tested in a tempest full gate
> run. I've started putting up a list of what functionality is missing from the
> tempest runs here:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/coverage-analysis
>
> The periodic jobs uses the same configuration as our current gate jobs, so
> there are couple cases where we having testing but they depend on things not
> set in tempest.conf (Resize action for example)
>
> Then based on the results of the coverage report I put together a list of
> proposed additional tests here:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/MissingTempestTests
Will you be converting some of the bigger and/or contained tasks to
blueprints for Tempest?
Y.
>
> Keep in mind that both of these etherpads are still WIP (and quite incomplete)
> and I'll be continually updating them over the next few days until I go through
> the rest of the coverage reports. I just wanted to share what I'm working on
> and some of the initial findings. Feel free to ping me on IRC for specifics or
> questions about any of this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Treinish
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
More information about the openstack-qa
mailing list