So +1 Tim From: Lance Bragstad <lbragstad at gmail.com> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org> Date: Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 20:43 To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>, OpenStack Operators <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org> Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Consistent policy names The topic of having consistent policy names has popped up a few times this week. Ultimately, if we are to move forward with this, we'll need a convention. To help with that a little bit I started an etherpad [0] that includes links to policy references, basic conventions *within* that service, and some examples of each. I got through quite a few projects this morning, but there are still a couple left. The idea is to look at what we do today and see what conventions we can come up with to move towards, which should also help us determine how much each convention is going to impact services (e.g. picking a convention that will cause 70% of services to rename policies). Please have a look and we can discuss conventions in this thread. If we come to agreement, I'll start working on some documentation in oslo.policy so that it's somewhat official because starting to renaming policies. [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/consistent-policy-names -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20180912/b3aa07e7/attachment.html>