[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] LTS pragmatic example

Flavio Percoco flavio at redhat.com
Tue Nov 14 15:46:58 UTC 2017

On 14/11/17 22:33 +1100, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>This is still under the stable team reviews... NOT LTS.
>Your contacts for the Nova Stable team is ...
>Let's please be clear, we need new people to help with LTS plans.
>Current teams can't scale, they should not have to and it's totally
>unfair to expect them to do so.

I think you may have misunderstood Saverio's email. IIUC, what he was trying to
do was provide an example in favor of the LTS branches as discussed in Sydney,
rather than requesting for reviews or suggesting the stable team should do LTS.


>On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Saverio Proto <zioproto at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> here an example of a trivial patch that is important for people that
>> do operations, and they have to troubleshoot stuff.
>> with the old Stable Release thinking this patch would not be accepted
>> on old stable branches.
>> Let's see if this gets accepted back to stable/newton
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/If525313c63c4553abe8bea6f2bfaf75431ed18ea
>> Please note that a developers/operators that make the effort of fixing
>> this in master, should do also all the cherry-pickes back. We dont
>> have any automatic procudure for this.
>> thank you
>> Saverio

Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 862 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20171114/1502f230/attachment.sig>

More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list