[Openstack-operators] [neutron] Modify Default Quotas
Pierre Riteau
priteau at uchicago.edu
Thu Mar 23 23:46:04 UTC 2017
We’ve encountered the same issue in our cloud. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was quite common for systems with many tenants that are not active all the time.
You may be interested by this OSOps script: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/osops-tools-generic/tree/neutron/orphan_tool/delete_orphan_floatingips.py
The downside with this script is that it may delete a floating IP that was just allocated, if it runs just before the user attaches it to their instance.
We have chosen to write a script that releases floating IPs held by tenants only if the tenant is inactive for a period of time. We define inactive by not having run any instance during this period.
It is not a silver bullet though, because a tenant running only one instance can still keep 49 floating IPs unused, but we found that it helps a lot because most of the unused IPs were held by inactive tenants.
Ideally Neutron would be able to track when a floating IP was last attached and release it automatically after a configurable period of time.
> On 23 Mar 2017, at 12:47, Saverio Proto <zioproto at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> floating IPs is the real issue.
>
> When using horizon it is very easy for users to allocate floating ips
> but it is also very difficult to release them.
>
> In our production cloud we had to change the default from 50 to 2. We
> have to be very conservative with floatingips quota because our
> experience is that the user will never release a floating IP.
>
> A good starting point is to set the quota for the floatingips at the
> the same quota for nova instances.
>
> Saverio
>
>
> 2017-03-22 16:46 GMT+01:00 Morales, Victor <victor.morales at intel.com>:
>> Hey there,
>>
>>
>>
>> I noticed that Ihar started working on a change to increase the default
>> quotas values in Neutron[1]. Personally, I think that makes sense to change
>> it but I’d like to complement it. So, based on your experience, what should
>> be the most common quota value for networks, subnets, ports, security
>> groups, security rules, routers and Floating IPs per tenant?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards/Saludos
>>
>> Victor Morales
>>
>> irc: electrocucaracha
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444030
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list