Open Stack

+1 would be great to have some more people involved in this.

On 23/03/16 13:30, Shamail Tahir wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We could definitely use more attendance/help on the ops-tag team... The
> data in project navigator comes from multiple sources but the install
> guide availability[1], packages[2], etc. are derived from ops-tags[3].
> The team meets once a month (3rd Thursday of every month) to review open
> tags.  I agree with Tim that we should determine how we can automate the
> information collection as much as possible... It's not abandoned but
> more participation would be helpful.  We are nearing the point where we
> should start populating tags for Mitaka.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/openstack/ops-tags-team/blob/master/liberty/ops-docs-install-guide.json
> [2]
> https://github.com/openstack/ops-tags-team/blob/master/liberty/ops-packaged.json
> [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Tags
>
> Thanks,
> Shamail
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Hauke Bruno Wollentin
> <Hauke-Bruno.Wollentin at innovo-cloud.de
> <mailto:Hauke-Bruno.Wollentin at innovo-cloud.de>> wrote:
>
>     fullack with both of you. The project guide itself is an awesome
>     idea but don't know why, it looks a bit abandoned for now. Would be
>     great if someone - maybe from the cross project team(?) - could
>     point out how we all could make things better (or even who the right
>     person to talk to is ;)).
>
>     just my 2 cents,
>     cheers,
>     hauke
>
>
>     *From:* Gal Sagie <gal.sagie at gmail.com <mailto:gal.sagie at gmail.com>>
>     *Sent:* Mar 23, 2016 11:00 AM
>     *To:* Tim Bell
>     *Cc:* openstack-operators
>     *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] [tags] Appealing for change of tags
>
>     The projects themselves don't seems updated, there are other
>     projects in the big-tent that are not
>     listed there yet.
>
>     On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch
>     <mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch>> wrote:
>
>
>         Looking at projects like Barbican in the
>         https://www.openstack.org/software/releases/liberty/components/barbican,
>         they seem to have met some conditions which are currently marked
>         as ‘no’.
>
>         What is the mechanism to query these settings (either manual or
>         automatic) ?
>
>         As an example, there is significant documentation for Barbican
>         at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/barbican/ but it is
>         marked as ‘no’ in the page for
>         https://www.openstack.org/software/releases/liberty/components/barbican
>         Is there an install guide for this project guide (at
>         docs.openstack.org <http://docs.openstack.org>)?
>
>         How about adding
>
>           * some algorithmic description (i.e. automatic or manual) for
>             the selection ? If automatic, the algorithm could be
>             provided so the project knows what to do
>           * a process description for the manual cases for projects to
>             ask for a re-classification
>
>         Tim
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         OpenStack-operators mailing list
>         OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>         <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Best Regards ,
>
>     The G.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-operators mailing list
>     OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Shamail Tahir
> t: @ShamailXD
> tz: Eastern Time
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>