Open Stack

Hi,

We could definitely use more attendance/help on the ops-tag team... The
data in project navigator comes from multiple sources but the install guide
availability[1], packages[2], etc. are derived from ops-tags[3].  The team
meets once a month (3rd Thursday of every month) to review open tags.  I
agree with Tim that we should determine how we can automate the information
collection as much as possible... It's not abandoned but more participation
would be helpful.  We are nearing the point where we should start
populating tags for Mitaka.

[1]
https://github.com/openstack/ops-tags-team/blob/master/liberty/ops-docs-install-guide.json
[2]
https://github.com/openstack/ops-tags-team/blob/master/liberty/ops-packaged.json
[3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Tags

Thanks,
Shamail


On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Hauke Bruno Wollentin <
Hauke-Bruno.Wollentin at innovo-cloud.de> wrote:

> fullack with both of you. The project guide itself is an awesome idea but
> don't know why, it looks a bit abandoned for now. Would be great if someone
> - maybe from the cross project team(?) - could point out how we all could
> make things better (or even who the right person to talk to is ;)).
>
> just my 2 cents,
> cheers,
> hauke
>
>
> *From:* Gal Sagie <gal.sagie at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Mar 23, 2016 11:00 AM
> *To:* Tim Bell
> *Cc:* openstack-operators
> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] [tags] Appealing for change of tags
>
> The projects themselves don't seems updated, there are other projects in
> the big-tent that are not
> listed there yet.
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>
>>
>> Looking at projects like Barbican in the
>> https://www.openstack.org/software/releases/liberty/components/barbican,
>> they seem to have met some conditions which are currently marked as ‘no’.
>>
>> What is the mechanism to query these settings (either manual or
>> automatic) ?
>>
>> As an example, there is significant documentation for Barbican at
>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/barbican/ but it is marked as ‘no’
>> in the page for
>> https://www.openstack.org/software/releases/liberty/components/barbican  Is
>> there an install guide for this project guide (at docs.openstack.org)?
>>
>> How about adding
>>
>>    - some algorithmic description (i.e. automatic or manual) for the
>>    selection ? If automatic, the algorithm could be provided so the project
>>    knows what to do
>>    - a process description for the manual cases for projects to ask for
>>    a re-classification
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards ,
>
> The G.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>


-- 
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160323/14ba8f76/attachment.html>