Open Stack

From: Matt Joyce <matt at nycresistor.com<mailto:matt at nycresistor.com>>
Date: Thursday 3 March 2016 at 18:35
To: Robert Starmer <robert at kumul.us<mailto:robert at kumul.us>>
Cc: openstack-operators <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>>, "community at lists.openstack.org<mailto:community at lists.openstack.org>" <community at lists.openstack.org<mailto:community at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-community] Recognising Ops contributions

How about just OPS : {$Verified_Count} Physical Nodes

=D

It would make visits to the Marketplace interesting…. Wandering around with a badge with the number of nodes would certainly get vendor attention :-)

Overall, I’d like to be sure we cater for non-Ops contributions also. There are consumers of clouds to factor into the discussion and i’d like to see something where a contributor to the foundation application catalog gets credit or an ISV in the marketplace.

Tim


On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Robert Starmer <robert at kumul.us<mailto:robert at kumul.us>> wrote:
I setup an etherpad to try to capture this discussion:

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OperatorRecognition

R

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Robert Starmer <robert at kumul.us<mailto:robert at kumul.us>> wrote:
I agree with the list of contributions that should garner value, and I really like TOC, because some folks who meet the other operators requirements may not actually _run_ OpenStack, they may "operate" on top :)



On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote:
Hello Folks,

I have to admit that I really like these two:

TOC / Technical Ops Contributor
IRO / I Run OpenStack

Edgar

From: Pierre Freund <pierre.freund at osones.com<mailto:pierre.freund at osones.com>>
Date: Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:57 AM
To: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>
Cc: "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>>, "community at lists.openstack.org<mailto:community at lists.openstack.org>" <community at lists.openstack.org<mailto:community at lists.openstack.org>>, "Jonathan D. Proulx" <jon at csail.mit.edu<mailto:jon at csail.mit.edu>>, Shilla Saebi <shilla.saebi at gmail.com<mailto:shilla.saebi at gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-community] Recognising Ops contributions

This needs a catchy name.
Yes, yes it does. Suggestions?
​​
Some suggestions, but I'm not a native english speaker, it might sounds not natural.

AOC / Active Ops Contributor
ACC / Active Community Contributor
TOC / Technical Ops Contributor
Proud Ops
POP / Proudly Operating in Production
IRO / I Run OpenStack

--
Pierre F
​reund​

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators




_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160303/f659c969/attachment-0001.html>