Open Stack

>
>
> We're deciding not to innovate a solution to allow people to
> participate in a group that is attempting to provide innovative ideas.
> How ironic. I actually don't think it would require much innovation.
> The Ceph guys run their entire design summit remotely, and I'm certain
> that it way beyond one or two people. If anyone has participated in
> that process, pointers would be welcome. If not, we can certainly post
> to their list and ask for suggestions. I imagine Sage might pipe up
> with some interesting thoughts at the very least.
>
>

If we can come up with a way to do so without reducing the effectiveness of
the people who have taken the time to travel in order to speak face to
face, then by all means, we should go for it. But it is not fair for us
(the US folks who cannot travel) to impose something that reduces the
effectiveness upon a midcycle that has already been planned. Perhaps the
folks that planned this one can weigh in.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20151117/4b03dc15/attachment.html>