[Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.
Curtis
serverascode at gmail.com
Tue Nov 17 04:14:19 UTC 2015
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Shamail <itzshamail at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Nov 16, 2015, at 7:01 PM, Jonathan Proulx <jon at csail.mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Let me restate the question a bit as I think I'm hearing two different
>> responses that may be getting conflated.
>>
>> Option 1: There's a single Ops Midcycle that shifts around and we
>> look at ways to increase remote participation. (obviously this doesn't
>> preclude other meetups)
> How about one "official" mid-cycle (following trend of most other projects/groups) but regional ops groups can pick up the etherpads and dive deeper into topics of interest at the regional level?
>
> Essentially a hub/spoke where each meetup adds content to the same etherpads, etc. thus allowing topics to emerge once per cycle and be worked/discussed iteratively.
I think I would prefer a hub and spoke style of some kind as well, not
sure what that exactly would look like though. Perhaps that just means
the first option that was laid out, which mentions not precluding
other regional operator meetups. I'm quite interested in the
Manchester meetup because I think operators there will be deploying
clouds more like the one I do. My two cents. :)
Thanks,
Curtis.
>>
>> Option 2: There are multiple Ops Meetups around midcycle (presumably
>> starting with North America, Asia, and Europe) and we look at ways of
>> coordinationg those re reduce duplication of effort any synthesis of
>> results.
>>
>> I was advocating option 1 mostly because I think synthesis of option 2
>> is harder than stepping up preparation of etherpads before sessions
>> and review of them afterward is which is motly the level of remote
>> participation I'd envision in the first case (possibly also running
>> some email threads on any reccommendations that come out and seem
>> controvertial for any reason)
>>
>> So far though seems the tide is runiing toward option 2, multiple
>> meet-ups. Though wee're still at a very small sample size.
>>
>> -Jon
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:50:52AM -0500, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
>> :Hi All,
>> :
>> :1st User Committee IRC meeting will be today at 19:00UTC on
>> :#openstack-meeting, we haven't exactly settled on an agenda yet but I
>> :hope to raise this issue the...
>> :
>> :It has been suggested that we make the February 15-16 European Ops
>> :Meetup in Manchester UK [1] the 'official' OPs Midcycle. Previously
>> :all mid cycles have been US based.
>> :
>> :Personally I like the idea of broadening or geographic reach rather
>> :than staying concentrated in North America. I particularly like it
>> :being 'opposite' the summit location.
>> :
>> :This would likely trade off some depth of participation as fewer
>> :of the same people would be able to travel to all midcycles in person.
>> :
>> :Discuss...(also come by #openstack-meeting at 19:00 UTC if you think
>> :this needs real time discussion)
>> :
>> :-Jon
>> :
>> :
>> :--
>> :
>> :1. http://www.eventbrite.com/e/european-openstack-operators-meetup-tickets-19405855436?aff=es2
>>
>> --
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
--
Blog: serverascode.com
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list