Open Stack

Also packaging python is basically non-trivial to the point that most folks
are talking about pushing python around as virtual machines, containers, or
more likely virtualenvs ( packaged or otherwise ).  pip is a PITA, we tend
to do terrible things to pbr that we shouldn't because there is a lack of
knowledge about how to work with it in a packaging scenario.

-Matt

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Subbu Allamaraju <subbu at subbu.org> wrote:

> Regarding the discussion on tags, here is my take from the discussion on
> Monday.
>
> 1. There is vehement agreement that having an integrated release
> consisting of a small “inner ring” set of service is desirable. There are
> 6-7 projects that a majority of operators deploy.
>
> 2. There is a general concern that dropping the integrated release process
> entirely creates more operability hurdles than that exist today.
>
> 3. Many other projects are not seeing adoption for reasons such as lacking
> a minimum viable feature set, lack of operational feedback, concerns on
> scalability etc. Examples include designate, trove, zaqar, ceilometer etc.
>
> 4. There is also a concern of whether tags make the tent too large and
> chaotic as any project can essentially claim to be an OpenStack project.
> This may leave it open for vendors and distro providers to define a product
> out of those OpenStack projects, eventually fragmenting the open source
> nature.
>
> 5. Operators can certainly help shape an MVP feature set.
>
> Subbu
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Daniel Comnea <comnea.dani at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> Are you aware of any other feedback etherpads for the other discussions?
>
> Cheers,
> Dani
>
> P.S for Nova Sean provided one of the best summaries.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>
>> I don't think there is any recording. The etherpads and summaries on
>> superuser.openstack.org give a feeling for the discussions though and
>> are an interesting read. The tags one looked particularly lively.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Adam Huffman [mailto:adam.huffman at gmail.com]
>> > Sent: 10 March 2015 10:50
>> > To: Daniel Comnea
>> > Cc: Tim Bell; openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops meetup
>> >
>> > I was going to ask that too...
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Adam
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Daniel Comnea <comnea.dani at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi Tim,
>> > >
>> > > For those who can't be physically there, will be any sort of
>> > > recordings/ output coming out from this sessions?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Dani
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Great to see lots of input for the ops meetup nexts week. Feel free
>> > >> to add your items to the agenda
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Session Etherpads:
>> > >>
>> > >>     Draft Agenda:
>> > >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-Februar
>> > >> y/006268.html
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Monday
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-OVS
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-security
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-app-eco-wg
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-tools-wg
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-large-deployments
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-tags
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-hardware
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-arch-show-tell
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Tuesday
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-rabbit-queue
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-nova-feedback
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-network-performance
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-capacity-mgmt
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-testing-interop
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-burning-issues
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-packaging
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-telco
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-arch-show-tell
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Feedback on the event & what you'd like to see in Vancouver:
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-feedback
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> > >> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> > >>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operato
>> > >> rs
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> > > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> > >
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operator
>> > > s
>> > >
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150313/718f8199/attachment.html>