Open Stack

Regarding the discussion on tags, here is my take from the discussion on Monday.

1. There is vehement agreement that having an integrated release consisting of a small “inner ring” set of service is desirable. There are 6-7 projects that a majority of operators deploy. 

2. There is a general concern that dropping the integrated release process entirely creates more operability hurdles than that exist today.

3. Many other projects are not seeing adoption for reasons such as lacking a minimum viable feature set, lack of operational feedback, concerns on scalability etc. Examples include designate, trove, zaqar, ceilometer etc. 

4. There is also a concern of whether tags make the tent too large and chaotic as any project can essentially claim to be an OpenStack project. This may leave it open for vendors and distro providers to define a product out of those OpenStack projects, eventually fragmenting the open source nature.

5. Operators can certainly help shape an MVP feature set.

Subbu


> On Mar 13, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Daniel Comnea <comnea.dani at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Tim,
> 
> Are you aware of any other feedback etherpads for the other discussions? 
> 
> Cheers,
> Dani
> 
> P.S for Nova Sean provided one of the best summaries.
>  
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>> I don't think there is any recording. The etherpads and summaries on superuser.openstack.org give a feeling for the discussions though and are an interesting read. The tags one looked particularly lively.
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Adam Huffman [mailto:adam.huffman at gmail.com]
>> > Sent: 10 March 2015 10:50
>> > To: Daniel Comnea
>> > Cc: Tim Bell; openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops meetup
>> >
>> > I was going to ask that too...
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Adam
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Daniel Comnea <comnea.dani at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi Tim,
>> > >
>> > > For those who can't be physically there, will be any sort of
>> > > recordings/ output coming out from this sessions?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Dani
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Great to see lots of input for the ops meetup nexts week. Feel free
>> > >> to add your items to the agenda
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Session Etherpads:
>> > >>
>> > >>     Draft Agenda:
>> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-Februar
>> > >> y/006268.html
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Monday
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-OVS
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-security
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-app-eco-wg
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-tools-wg
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-large-deployments
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-tags
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-hardware
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-arch-show-tell
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Tuesday
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-rabbit-queue
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-nova-feedback
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-network-performance
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-capacity-mgmt
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-testing-interop
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-burning-issues
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-packaging
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-telco
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-arch-show-tell
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Feedback on the event & what you'd like to see in Vancouver:
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-feedback
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> > >> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operato
>> > >> rs
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> > > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operator
>> > > s
>> > >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150313/e788e5cd/attachment.html>