Open Stack

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Jonathan Proulx <jon at jonproulx.com> wrote:

> More tracks makes it harder for small to medium size sites to cover.
> Not saying we shouldn't expand parallelism but we should be cautious.
>
> My site is a private university cloud with order of 100 hypervisors,
> we're more or less happy to send 2 people to summits and one to mid
> cycles, at least that's what I've gotten them to pay for in the past.
> Obviously we don't come close to covering summits.  The dual track
> (for one attendee) in PHL was OK and conflicts weren't too bad.
>
> The obvious alternative if we need more sessions would be to go longer
> and honestly I'm not keen on that either and would probably prefer
> wider over longer.
>

+1 on wider vs longer. if we do go longer, let's limit it to half-day
expansion (so folks can fly in or out that half day.)
Of course if it is in Timbuktu, that 1/2 day won't buy much in terms of
maximizing commute time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbuktu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150706/28f37ec4/attachment.html>