Open Stack

Most likely the latter, with due respects to the code.

Most likely that VPNaaS is not required for current usage scenarios.

On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:56 pm Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:

> I know I can’t wear both hats but in this case as Operator as one of the
> constant moderators for the neutron-related sessions, I can say that I have
> never received a report about the VPNaaS code from the Operators. This
> could be means two things, the code is terrific and nobody has issues with
> it or basically nobody uses it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Edgar
>
>
> From: Kyle Mestery
> Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 12:56 PM
> To: "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org"
> Cc: Paul Michali, Doug Wiegley
> Subject: [Openstack-operators] [neutron] Any users of Neutron's VPN
> advanced service?
>
> Operators:
>
> We (myself, Paul and Doug) are looking to better understand who might be
> using Neutron's VPNaaS code. We're looking for what version you're using,
> how long you're using it, and if you plan to continue deploying it with
> future upgrades. Any information operators can provide here would be
> fantastic!
>
> Thank you!
> Kyle
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150808/4e30f896/attachment.html>