> From: Jacob Godin <jacobgodin at gmail.com> > To: Mike Spreitzer/Watson/IBM at IBMUS > Cc: Daniel Comnea <comnea.dani at gmail.com>, OpenStack Operators > <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org> > Date: 04/15/2015 08:37 AM > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [Neutron] Floating IPs / Router Gateways > > Ah, gotcha. So you're not using overlapping subnets then. > > Unfortunately that hack wouldn't work in our environment, but > definitely something that others might consider using. Right, the solution I am using now imposes address constraints between tenants that share a router. I need to eliminate constraints between tenants, so I have to abandon the solution I am using. So I, too, am looking for different solution. I want to support a lot of tenants doing fairly unrestricted stuff, so all the connections --- from their Compute Instances that do NOT have a floating IP --- to public servers is more than I want to SNAT onto a *single* public address. Thanks, Mike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150417/66ca1878/attachment.html>