[Openstack-operators] Three Node Deployment Model

Anne Gentle anne at openstack.org
Thu Oct 23 17:58:22 UTC 2014


On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Hossein Zabolzadeh <zabolzadeh at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi there,
> I have an openstack deployment question. I have three physical
> server(Configurations are listed in the following). What is the best
> optimized production-ready deployment model to achieve the following
> goals in mind(Users will not exceeds more than 10)?
> - Ability to add more services(compute, controller, storage node)
> later, without service interruption
> - Ability to provide HA for all services, after more nodes added
> without service interruption
> - No need to change the deployment architecture later when more
> physical nodes and resources available(My physical infrastructure will
> be scaled later, and not limitted to these three physical machines).
> For example I don't know is it better to have 1 neutron node, or have
> two neutron service on my two compute nodes?
>

Hi - Have you read:
http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/scaling.html

and

http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/example_architecture.html#example_architecture-neutron

Horizontal scaling is covered in these as well as your neutron question.

Anne



> A really appreciate any helps.
> Thanks in advance.
> ------
> Server 1:
> RAM: 128GB
> HDD: 300GB
> ------
> Server 2:
> RAM: 128GB
> HDD: 300GB
> ------
> Server 3:
> RAM: 256GB
> HDD: 512GB
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20141023/b10bd6c6/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list