Open Stack

Lol, yes minimum scale ... but open to scale up (hopefully) quickly ;) ...
depending on how successful it's being adopted.

anyway, we're using "a)" .. straight up bridged to the real LAN :) .. so I
suppose we're OK for now

we also just use straight "flat" networks and wont utilize the tunneling of
private networks, etc. as the only users will be in-house ...

Alex



On 19 June 2014 00:30, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:

> On 19 June 2014 10:36, Alex Leonhardt <aleonhardt.py at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Clint!
> >
> > Yeah i'd do the DBs as Active / Passive first and do separate testing
> when
> > trying A/A our DBAs are actually testing something that may work (A/A)
> with
> > almost anything :)
> >
> > Rabbit - cool - I dont know Rabbit too well but dont expect much issues
> > there ...
> >
> > We are planning to run nova and neutron agent/s on every Hyper Visor to
> > avoid bottlenecks with "network nodes" and instead every HV would use its
> > own neutron/network service etc. - do you see any issues with that or
> have
> > you had any experience running that config ?
>
> You'll need then DVR patchset which I don't *think* has fully landed
> yet for that. Normal Neutron is either a) provider networks (VIF plugs
> straight into a bridge onto the LAN) or b) overlay networks (you get a
> centralised router).
>
> Anyhow, since you're talking minimum scale, I'd be amazed if you can
> bottleneck anything.
>
> -Rob
>
>
> --
> Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
> Distinguished Technologist
> HP Converged Cloud
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20140619/195a8c2d/attachment.html>