[Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-Operators] [Cinder] Request for input on new/advanced features
Stuart Fox
stuart at demonware.net
Tue Jul 29 00:02:16 UTC 2014
This sounds cool but wouldn't it put cinder in the data path if you are
replicating across vendors?
--
BR,
Stuart
On 14-07-28 3:01 PM gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
On 07/26/2014 11:28 AM, John Griffith wrote:
> Hey OS-Operators,
>
> There are two features being worked on currently that I'd love to get
> some feedback on:
>
> 1. Replication
i would like to Cinder to be able to replicate data between different
backend storages.
sometimes your DR site does not have the same storage backend as your
primary site, this is common when you rent the DR site.
the usual workaround for this is restore from backup over the DR
storage, which is painful and slow.
ideally i would have a Fast dedicated storage on primary site and a
bunch of lun(s) attached to a box with iscsi+lvm to provide volumes to
compute nodes.
if i have storage from the same 'vendor' on both sites that's great!
cinder could offload data replication to vendor's appliance
i know is a pony what i'm asking for, but i would really make a difference
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20140729/54a94254/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list