Open Stack

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info> wrote:
>>
>> Rather than waste your time making excuses let me state where we are and
>> where I would like to get to, also sharing my thoughts about how you can
>> get involved if you want to see this happen as badly as I have been told
>> you do.
>>
>> Where we are:
>>     * a great deal of foundation work has been accomplished to achieve
>> parity with nova-network and neutron to the extent that those involved
>> are ready for migration plans to be formulated and be put in place
>>     * a summit session happened with notes and intentions[0]
>>     * people took responsibility and promptly got swamped with other
>> responsibilities
>>     * spec deadlines arose and in neutron's case have passed
>>     * currently a neutron spec [1] is a work in progress (and it needs
>> significant work still) and a nova spec is required and doesn't have a
>> first draft or a champion
>>
>> Where I would like to get to:
>>     * I need people in addition to Oleg Bondarev to be available to help
>> come up with ideas and words to describe them to create the specs in a
>> very short amount of time (Oleg is doing great work and is a fabulous
>> person, yay Oleg, he just can't do this alone)
>>     * specifically I need a contact on the nova side of this complex
>> problem, similar to Oleg on the neutron side
>>     * we need to have a way for people involved with this effort to find
>> each other, talk to each other and track progress
>>     * we need to have representation at both nova and neutron weekly
>> meetings to communicate status and needs
>>
>> We are at K-2 and our current status is insufficient to expect this work
>> will be accomplished by the end of K-3. I will be championing this work,
>> in whatever state, so at least it doesn't fall off the map. If you would
>> like to help this effort please get in contact. I will be thinking of
>> ways to further this work and will be communicating to those who
>> identify as affected by these decisions in the most effective methods of
>> which I am capable.
>>
>> Thank you to all who have gotten us as far as well have gotten in this
>> effort, it has been a long haul and you have all done great work. Let's
>> keep going and finish this.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Anita.
>>
>> Thank you for volunteering to drive this effort Anita, I am very happy
> about this. I support you 100%.
>
> I'd like to point out that we really need a point of contact on the nova
> side, similar to Oleg on the Neutron side. IMHO, this is step 1 here to
> continue moving this forward.
>

At the summit the nova team marked the nova-network to neutron migration as
a priority [0], so we are collectively interested in seeing this happen and
want to help in any way possible.   With regard to a nova point of contact,
anyone in nova-specs-core should work, that way we can cover more time
zones.

>From what I can gather the first step is to finish fleshing out the first
spec [1], and it sounds like it would be good to get a few nova-cores
reviewing it as well.




[0]
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/priorities/kilo-priorities.html
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142456/


>
> Thanks,
> Kyle
>
>
>> [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-nova-network-to-neutron
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142456/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20141222/516524c8/attachment.html>