Proposed change to nova's default rate limits: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/34774/ On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net>wrote: > On 27 June 2013 17:57, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote: > > +1 > > > > > > > > What are the limits in the other components ? It would be good to be > > consistent, so we don’t end up with high limits on Nova leading to > hitting > > the limits on keystone or glance. > > I'm not sure - so far we haven't hit rate limits on other components; > we have hit quota limits in nova and neutron; we have hit bugs due to > other too-low settings or inappropriate default backends (like the > keystone kvs store default, now fixed) : but nothing coupled to the > nova rate limits. > > So - I do agree that harmonising things across services is a good > idea, just can't point at any other ones we've had to bump up yet. > > -Rob > > -- > Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com> > Distinguished Technologist > HP Cloud Services > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20130627/654fd9d2/attachment.html>