Open Stack

http://summit.openstack.org/sessions/view/68

I've submitted a proposal on a similar subject but got rejected :) Maybe
because of redundancy.

Looking forward to talking about this at the summit.

Cheers,
LZY

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Duncan McGreggor <duncan at dreamhost.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Stefano Maffulli <stefano at openstack.org>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:03 -0700, Matt Joyce wrote:
> >> Problem of course is many operators aren't on the design summit
> >> contributor list ( ala don't have codes to get into it ) and if it's
> >> later it's 500 USD to attend.
> >
> > There will be over 400 people at the summit, not all of them are
> > developers. I expect lots of operators/users have a representation
> > there. Will there be enough to justify having this discussion there? I
> > don't know but we can try.
> >
> > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 17:16 -0400, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> >> That's a really good point. In the post-conference conversations that
> >> deal with attendance policy, this should be kept in mind.
> >
> > We probably should set a date for a post-mortem discussion, after the
> > conference. I'm quite sure I'll take a few days off after April 20,
> > maybe have a couple of live feedback sessions in the first week of May
> > would work?
> >
> >> In lieu of not being able to attend in person, keep in mind the
> >> live-casting that will be done,
> >
> >
> > We're not yet sure to be able to offer this. Wait for an official
> > communication.
> >
> >> in combination with IRC channels.
> >
> > This we can do: use IRC but there will be only one projector in the
> > rooms, not two like at UDS. Each track leader can decide how to use it
> > (for IRC or something else).
> >
> > Since you are already familiar with UDS setup, would you mind setting up
> > the IRC channels for each of the rooms at the summit? This is the layout
> > of the rooms and their expected usage:
> >
> >        Ballroom: Intro Plenary, Breakout tables, Lightning Talks
> >
> >        Seacliff A+B: Design summit sessions (fishbowl setup)*
> >        Seacliff C: Design summit sessions (fishbowl setup)*
> >        Seacliff D: Design summit sessions (fishbowl setup)*
> >        Marina: Design summit sessions (fishbowl setup)*
> >        Bayview B: Design summit sessions (fishbowl setup)*
> >
> >        Golden Gate: Unconference room (theater setup)*
> >        Bayview A: Developer's lounge
> >
> > The association between rooms+track will be published soon, once the
> > revisions on summit.openstack.org are completed.
>
> The following channels have been created on Freenode and are registered.
>
> #osds-ballroom
> #osds-seacliff-a-b
> #osds-seacliff-c
> #osds-seacliff-d
> #osds-marina
> #osds-bayview-a
> #osds-bayview-b
> #osds-golden-gate
>
> Each channel is also getting logged, viewable via HTTP here:
>  http://irclogs.osds.cogitat.io/
>
> Feel free to put another logger in there ;-)
>
> At UDS, messages get sent to IRC channels at a countdown interval...
> not sure if we have anything that sophisticated for OSDS. At the very
> least, we can monitor the times ourselves and post messages to the
> channels.
>
> d
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-operators mailing list
> Openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20120412/da2614e0/attachment-0002.html>