Open Stack

W dniu 10.01.2018 o 18:28, Jeremy Stanley pisze:
> On 2018-01-10 09:06:43 -0800 (-0800), Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
>> So it's my understanding (which is limited at best) that zuul
>> currently doesn't support something like "this job has to run on
>> nodepool X", which would be necessary. We might need to add some sort
>> of metadata for nodepools and be able to specify in zuul job that
>> "this job has to land on node with metadata X", like architecture:
>> arm64.

> This shouldn't be an issue since our node types are tightly coupled
> to the images they boot, and the arm64 architecture images will I'm
> sure get distinct names (as an offshoot of this though, we may end
> up extending the names of our current amd64 images to embed
> processor architecture names for consistency, but this is one of the
> many points we'll need to debate).

Docker images can be multiarch so same names are used on different
architectures.