Open Stack

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017, at 05:10 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On 03/16/2017 11:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > I'd also like to be certain the current DIB contributors are
> > entirely disinterested in forming a separate official team in
> > OpenStack as I doubt the TC would reject such a proposal (I'd
> > happily support it).
> 
> Assuming "interested" means you had more than a couple of trivial
> changes in the last release period would leave a voting group of maybe
> 5 people [1]?  It seems like a lot of bureaucracy to start up a whole
> team for that?
> 
> Quite a lot of brain-power seems to have been spent on this so far.
> Personally I don't see the difference between TripleO cores who
> technically have power but don't use it or infra cores who technically
> have power but don't use it.  I'm just finding it hard to find a hook
> to engage with the whole thing.  If people feel strongly about moving
> it under infra ok, but I'm not sure what difference it makes.
> 
> -i
> 
> [1]
> http://stackalytics.com/?module=diskimage-builder&metric=commits&release=ocata
> 

OK, now that we've let this topic sit on on both ML's for over a week
(in addition to all the previous discussions) I think we can safely say
that anyone who might have had an objection has had enough time to voice
it.

It looks like the governance change is moving forward, so the next steps
seem to be wait for that to merge and then work through the few items on
the etherpad.

Thanks,
Greg