Open Stack

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelanger at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum <nibz at spencerkrum.com> wrote:
>> > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start
>> > a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate
>> > attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each
>> > other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel
>> > any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but coordination
>> > sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear
>> > to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct
>> > place is something we should be careful to do.
>> >
>> > We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on
>> > talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time.
>>
>> Yeah, we don't tend to prepare the presentations until after our talks
>> have been accepted and that's when we use the publications repo.
>>
>> I like using the mailing list as a notification mechanism but I think
>> we should also maintain an etherpad with a listing so we can keep it
>> all organized in the longer term.
>>
> I'd be happy to see a etherpad URL we can use to list conferences and talks
> people are thinking of talking at.

Your wish...

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infra-conferences-2016

-- 
Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2