[OpenStack-Infra] Infra priorities and spec cleanup
Anita Kuno
anteaya at anteaya.info
Tue Jun 21 18:01:46 UTC 2016
On 06/20/2016 09:22 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-06-08 23:08:16 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Store Build Logs in Swift
>> [...]
>>> We should remove the original spec from our priority list (since
>>> that's basically already ceased to be an actual priority), and
>>> probably supercede it with the AFS proposal.
> [...]
>> Additionally the urgency of this spec seems to have been reduced (due to
>> limiting the retention on logs). We should perhaps reconsider if it's a
>> priority spec or not after we've decided on a path forward.
>
> That makes sense, though I think we can agree the original spec (and
> accompanying implementation) has ceased to be treated as a priority
> so it's a bit disingenuous to leave it on our priority list.
>
> Anyway, I've pushed a cleanup/update change at
> https://review.openstack.org/331903 which:
>
> * removes logs-in-swift
> * replaces maniphest with task-tracker
> * adds nodepool-zookeeper-workers due to its coupling with zuulv3
> * updates the Gerrit query string/URL accordingly
>
> I'll put it on the meeting agenda now for formal council vote this
> week. If approved, this leaves us at 6 priority specs, so if we
> consider that we were pretty well saturated at 8 last cycle, we can
> also discuss adding a couple more we expect to be spending
> significant time on over the remainder of this cycle or whether
> sticking with those 6 is perhaps better for focusing our efforts?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
Sorry if I should have replied before and didn't, like a game of double
dutch I try to time when it is my turn and sometimes I miss.
What is the status if Ipsilon? Since the task tracker spec
implementation phase 2 hinges on Ipsilon being in place I think Ipsilon
is a priority.
Thanks,
Anita.
More information about the OpenStack-Infra
mailing list