Open Stack

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016, at 09:37 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> As discussed in yesterday's team meeting[1], it's time to start
> thinking ahead to our Ocata design summit sessions. I've created a
> planning pad[2] with some information on the format and constraints.
> 
> Consensus seems to be that we tend to get more out of workrooms than
> fishbowls, so if we're going to request fewer of one than we had at
> the Newton summit I think it should be fishbowls. To that end, I've
> put us down for one fishbowl and five workrooms this time, but could
> be convinced to shift that balance to two fishbowls and four
> workrooms if the early ideas list favor fishbowl format more than
> they have in previous cycles (we still have a week to adjust our
> official allocation request).
> 
> [1]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-08-23-19.01.html
> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infra-ocata-summit-planning
> [3] 

Another thing that might be nice is getting at least one group of
workroom time slots adjacent to each other so that we have a "long"
session if we need it. Not sure if the scheduling will make that
possible though.

Clark