Open Stack

Hi,

For me:

 - would not work: 03:00 UTC -- 12:00 UTC
 + better: 20:00 -- 01:00 UTC

As for having alternating meetings vs. two different meeting times on the
same week, I am leaning towards alternating. I have no strong opinion on
this though.

Thanks,

Mikhail Medvedev (mmedvede)

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:09 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com <
trinath.somanchi at freescale.com> wrote:

> Hi Anita-
>
> I'm okay/happy with your proposal on 08:00 AM UTC on Tuesdays.
>
> +1
>
> --
> Trinath Somanchi - B39208
> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 7:48 PM
> To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for
> Additional Meeting for third-party
>
> Thanks for all the responses so far.
>
> This is to find an *additional* meeting time. This is not to have meeting
> times that switch from week to week. That would only confuse people. We
> don't need that. Trying to find a meeting time that would work for
> everybody doesn't work, hence the direction to create an
> *additional* meeting time. That way if you miss one, you can attend
> another.
>
> So far we have:
> Josh's suggestion of 00:00am Tuesday UTC Nurit's suggestion of Mondays
> anytime between 8:00 - 16:00 Salvadore's seconding of Josh's proposal
> Trinath's suggestion of 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays
>
> 1400 and 2200 doesn't give us anything better than what we have.
>
> Based on conversations at the summit, I would really like to see if Nurit
> and Josh can convene on an agreed time, I would really like to see both of
> them being able to attend on a regular basis.
>
> If we tried to work with an 8:00 utc time, either Monday or Tuesday, would
> that work for you, Josh and Nurit? (That would be 7pm in the evening for
> you, Josh - I think - is that workable?)
>
> Thanks I appreciate the interest,
> Anita.
>
>
> On 12/02/2014 08:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> > 1800UTC should generally work for Europe. The only issue is that it
> > falls right around dinner time.
> > It is however a good timing since most of the night hours fall over
> > the pacific ocean.
> >
> > Therefore I tend to agree with Joshua's proposal since with that time
> > range most of the night hours would fall over the atlantic.
> > Ideally 0600UTC is perfectly symmetric to the other meeting time, but
> > it might be a bit tricky for western and central Europe, especially
> > during winter.
> > Anytime between 0700UTC and 0900UTC would be better for Europe, but
> > might fall towards dinner time for Australia and be a bit
> > uncomfortable for New Zealand during their summer.
> >
> > Anyway, this proposal would make the meeting time prohibitive for
> > eastern/central US & Canada as well as South America. I don't know if
> > that's acceptable considering that, from what I gather, most of the
> > regular attendees come from those time zones.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Salvatore
> >
> > On 2 December 2014 at 12:44, Kurt Taylor <kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for starting this discussion Anita.
> >>
> >> The existing meeting time on Monday has never worked well for me. We
> >> could follow what other working groups have done, having alternating
> >> meeting times to accommodate everyone.
> >>
> >> I propose that we have 2 meetings of Third-party CI Ops, alternating
> weeks:
> >> Wednesday 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 Wednesday 2200 UTC in
> >> #openstack-meeting-3
> >>
> >> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Nurit Vilosny <nuritv at mellanox.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> HI,
> >>> Thanks Anita for pushing it. We will be able to be much more
> >>> involved if meetings would be earlier.
> >>> We're located in Israel, so Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00,
> >>> will be ideal for us.
> >>>
> >>> Nurit
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com [mailto:
> >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:32 AM
> >>> To: Anita Kuno; openstack Development Mailing List;
> >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for
> >>> Additional Meeting for third-party
> >>>
> >>> Hi-
> >>>
> >>> Its nice to have CI operators meetings.
> >>>
> >>> I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208
> >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM
> >>> To: openstack Development Mailing List;
> >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org
> >>> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting
> >>> for third-party
> >>>
> >>> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was
> >>> to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate
> >>> from non-North American time zones.
> >>>
> >>> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you.
> >>> The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which
> >>> works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a
> >>> time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would
> be ideal.
> >>>
> >>> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these
> >>> meetings, he is in Australia.
> >>>
> >>> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those
> >>> interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks everyone,
> >>> Anita.
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> >>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/attachments/20141202/4f8e7cc2/attachment-0001.html>