[OpenStack-I18n] stackalytics translation stats API is broken????
Remo Mattei
remo at rm.ht
Mon May 16 19:18:09 UTC 2016
Ian,
as you can see
Launchpad Id:
remo-o
Email:
Remo at rm.ht
Thanks
> On May 16, 2016, at 12:01, Remo Mattei <remo at rm.ht> wrote:
>
> my id is the same on launchpad and zanate
>
> which is Remo at rm.ht <mailto:Remo at rm.ht>
>
> This should be also usable on OpenStack.
>
> Any other suggestions
>
>
>> On May 16, 2016, at 04:02, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> On 5/16/16 4:33 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
>>> Well I just checked and no there are no diff on this list but I still do not have any words translated.
>>> What needs to be done to have this fixed?
>> What are your launchpad and Zanata ID?
>> If they are different, Stackalytics will not find your translation counts.
>>
>> I am asking because your translated words are zero on Stackalytics, which may be different from
>> Akihiro-san and Kato-san's case because their counts are not zero.
>>
>> If you are in the case I mentioned, then you need to add your user data into detault_data.json in the Stackalytics repository,
>> similar to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/284638/1/etc/default_data.json .
>>
>> Fortunately(?), my launchpad, gerrit and Zanata IDs are all the same, so I do not need to add my date on this file :)
>>
>>
>> With many thanks,
>>
>> /Ian
>>
>>>
>>> Remo
>>>> On May 15, 2016, at 10:55, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi at gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Remo!
>>>>
>>>> Your translation count on Stackalytics is zero?
>>>> If then, I think [1] and [2] will help to solve your problem :)
>>>>
>>>> [1]http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087537.html
>>>> [2]http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087659.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With many thanks,
>>>>
>>>> /Ian
>>>>
>>>> Remo Mattei wrote on 5/16/2016 2:22 AM:
>>>>> The last 2 months I translated about 400 words but stack does not even show any. It will be great to get this fixed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Inviato da iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>> Il giorno 15 mag 2016, alle ore 09:56, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi at gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi at gmail.com>> ha scritto:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I might have found the problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is that there can be several 'Translated' results within a week,
>>>>>> however, those results are saved with the same primary key.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have just proposed https://review.openstack.org/316460 .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure whether 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources,
>>>>>> but at least, generating the primary key for translation records on record_processor.py
>>>>>> does not use 'savedDate' field, as Shengjing mentioned.
>>>>>> If 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, please tell me, then I will change the review :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With many thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Ian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SJ Zhu wrote on 5/16/2016 12:14 AM:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi at gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I have a question, although it is not mainly related to wrong Stackalytics
>>>>>>>> stats.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have found that API 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s'
>>>>>>>> and API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s' generate
>>>>>>>> different results.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For example, from Apr 1 2016 to today, my count is 34320 with the first API,
>>>>>>>> but the send API generates 29490 for the same period.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I do know why the two APIs generate different numbers.
>>>>>>>> Can statistics numbers on user API and the sum of results from each project
>>>>>>>> API be different?
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Previously Stackalytics uses API
>>>>>>> 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s'.
>>>>>>> But I change it to 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' in
>>>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288871/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I may find the BUG but I have no time to fix it these days. So I hope
>>>>>>> someone to help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stackalytics will get the results every week. And
>>>>>>> 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' will return
>>>>>>> everyday's count. However Stackalytics seems not to sum a week's work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To fix it, I think we can change the way how Stackalytics uses
>>>>>>> Zanata's API. Based on
>>>>>>> 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' we can get 'savedDate'. So just use the
>>>>>>> 'savedDate' to display
>>>>>>> on Stackalytics. I haven't read the code carefully but I think the
>>>>>>> change is possible.
>>>>>>> What's more we can debug the wrong results on Stackalytics more conveniently.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But there's another question. How can we fix the old results on Stackalytics?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> OpenStack-I18n mailing list
>>>>>> OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org>
>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-I18n mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org>
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-I18n mailing list
> OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n>
>
> !DSPAM:573a19236031948371752!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/attachments/20160516/7503ba7f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mail
Type: image/png
Size: 399 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/attachments/20160516/7503ba7f/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the OpenStack-I18n
mailing list