[OpenStack-docs] [opsntack arch design] why not ceph is recommended for shared storage

Blair Bethwaite blair.bethwaite at gmail.com
Mon Oct 16 11:16:37 UTC 2017


Hi Chengwei,

Sounds like a bug or oversight in the doc. I suggest you find the
"Found An Error? Report A Bug" link at the bottom of the page and file
a bug for this.

Best regards,

On 16 October 2017 at 18:25, Chengwei Yang <chengwei.yang.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm now reading openstack arch design and I found that it doesn't list
> ceph as an option for shared storage, check below
>
> https://docs.openstack.org/arch-design/design-compute/design-compute-storage.html
>
> ```
> Choice of file system
>
> If you want to support shared-storage live migration, you need to
> configure a distributed file system.
>
> Possible options include:
>
> * NFS (default for Linux)
> * GlusterFS
> * MooseFS
> * Lustre
> ```
>
> As I understand, we need block storage here rather than filesystem, and
> ceph is the recommended one, am I right?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Chengwei
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>



-- 
Cheers,
~Blairo



More information about the OpenStack-docs mailing list