[OpenStack-docs] [OpenStack-Infra] Training guides meeting @Barcelona Summit

Ian Y. Choi ianyrchoi at gmail.com
Thu Nov 10 18:10:50 UTC 2016


Ildiko Vancsa wrote on 11/10/2016 4:57 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I like the ISO week numbers better. I think it’s more consistent, 
> gives a regular cadence and does not cause confusions with having a 
> meeting on the 5th week or not for instance.
>
> My 2 cents.
Make sense. Then IMO changing [1] with biweekly-odd or documenting this 
as description would be good.
For monthly meeting occurrence idea, I would like to follow another mail 
thread [2].

Although the next week is even according to ISO week numbers, let's have 
training-guides meeting
on next Tuesday 13:00 UTC and make accordance for that, since there were 
no training-guides team meeting for latest 3 weeks.

Is this okay for all training-guides meeting attendees?


[1] 
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/irc-meetings/tree/meetings/training-guides-team-meeting.yaml
[2] 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2016-November/004835.html


With many thanks,

/Ian
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Ildikó
>
>
>> On 2016. Nov 9., at 20:21, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:ianyrchoi at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> IMO if there is an IRC meeting on every week with alternating times 
>> for odd and even weeks,
>> having two bi-weekly schedules with alternating times would be 
>> self-explanatory.
>> However, if the meeting frequency would be just one or two in a month,
>> then referring such as n-th week in every month would be more 
>> intuitive I think.
>>
>> Unfortunately current yaml2ical does not support such logistics,
>> but my WIP patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/395762/) will make 
>> a clue
>> to support such logistics in the near future I think :)
>>
>> Note that I suggest not to consider 5th weeks because some months do 
>> not have 5th weeks.
>>
>>
>> With many thanks,
>>
>> /Ian
>>
>> Jeremy Stanley wrote on 11/9/2016 10:45 PM:
>>> On 2016-11-09 13:34:34 +0900 (+0900), Ian Y. Choi wrote:
>>>> My understanding of *odd* weeks is the 1st and 3rd weeks in every 
>>>> month,
>>>> since we actually had training-guides meetings with such logistics 
>>>> a few
>>>> months ago.
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> So you skip 5th weeks when those happen? Or you have back-to-back
>>> meeting weeks in those cases?
>>>
>>> The way alternating weeks are usually interpreted (and handled in
>>> the IRC meeting scheduling automation we have) is based on even or
>>> odd ISO week numbers:
>>>
>>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/yaml2ical/tree/README.rst?id=c29e042#n163
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_week_date
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org 
>> <mailto:OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20161111/5345ea41/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the OpenStack-docs mailing list