Open Stack

Considering these are all *developer* docs, can we not remove all the old
references? Developers should be developing on master :)

Less aggressively, can we remove some of the point releases from old
versions? I doubt 2013.1 is different from 2013.1.5 (or 2013.1.1, 2013.1.2,
... etc), as we don't backport doc fixes.

There are also old files that have been renamed, but the build html still
lingers, as far back as 2012 (see keystone.*.html)

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:

> On 2016-08-31 15:19, Steve Martinelli wrote:
> > I noticed that keystone is the 2nd highest at >900MB, our docs should
> > not be nearly that big. Any chance you can dig into that one a bit and
> > see whats in there?
>
> Sure, let me add to the etherpad...
>
> It's gems like http://docs.openstack.org/developer/keystone/2012.2.3/
>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>        HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20160831/7a390ab2/attachment.html>