[OpenStack-docs] Merging RST version of operators guide into openstack-manuals?
Andreas Jaeger
aj at suse.com
Thu Apr 28 19:02:48 UTC 2016
On 04/28/2016 11:59 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Christian Berendt
> <christian at berendt.io <mailto:christian at berendt.io>> wrote:
>
> On 28 April 2016 at 11:51:16, Andreas Jaeger (aj at suse.com
> <mailto:aj at suse.com>(mailto:aj at suse.com <mailto:aj at suse.com>)) wrote:
>
> > Does anybody see problems with that? Otherwise let's do that before we
> > tackle the rest of the RST conversion.
>
> Makes sense to me. What about the other guides?
>
> Should we discuss to move all guides (over the migration to RST)
> into the openstack-manuals repository? I do not know why we have
> decided in the past to create separate repositories for some of the
> guides.
>
>
> It was for enabling review teams who knew the content best. This model
> still makes sense for security guide to me. I'm fine with the Ops Guide
> going back into openstack-manuals but do check with anyone who has +2
> specifically on the separate repo please.
For operations-guide there are no extra reviewers, it has the same core
group as openstack-manuals.
For ha-guide, security-guide: We have separate core teams and should
leave those separate if we want to continue this way.
note that any merge will loose all history of the files,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
More information about the OpenStack-docs
mailing list