Open Stack

As I wrote in a comment on the patch, why not simply install and configure
Apache separately like we do for all the other distributions that don't
package it with keystone?

Also, keystone isn't my only concern. I haven't seen any effort to test
Debian with other significant changes for Liberty such as a completely
different architecture with Linux bridge instead of OVS, use of only the
keystone v3 API, and removal of the cinder v1 API.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:

> On 2015-10-13 14:46, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> On 10/12/2015 03:59 PM, Karin Levenstein wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/12/15, 5:13 AM, "Christian Berendt" <christian at berendt.io> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello everybody.
>>>>
>>>> What is the current status of
>>>>
>>>> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/liberty/installguide
>>>> -liberty-debian.html
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> This patch needs to be rebased and updated, for one thing:
>>>
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215105/
>>>
>>> It hasn't been touched in a while.
>>>
>>
>> Well, comments like the one from Matt aren't helping at all. If we don't
>> recognize and accept the differences that there are between Debian and
>> other operating systems, I don't see how it can be done.
>>
>> I *do not* want to re-live what happen with Matt just being so harsh and
>> destroying the Debian documentation effort which happen in the beginning
>> of this year. I am ok to work on bugs *if* they are actionable and
>> constructive. Let's do one baby step after another.
>>
>> I have rebased the above patch. Could we have at least this patch
>> approved, so we could move forward with the rest of the guide? If there
>> is still improvements to be done on that same chapter, feel free to open
>> a bug just right after the patch is accepted.
>>
>> As I have finished packaging Liberty, like after each cycle, I do have
>> time to work on this myself. I am motivated to do it, but I need support
>> from the doc team and some +2 fast to make it happen.
>>
> >
>
>> Also, yes, we maybe shouldn't re-add the Debian docs in the front page
>> at docs.openstack.org right away now, but could we at least re-add the
>> automatic generation of docs, even on a not advertised page? This would
>> help me a lot.
>>
>
> The docs are available since several weeks from our draft page, they are
> automatically generated.
>
> With your proposal of not adding Debian to the front page, let's review
> the content properly and merge it when it's ready - there's no need to rush
> that one in now,
>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>        HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20151013/04d435ca/attachment.html>