Open Stack

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Lana Brindley <openstack at lanabrindley.com>
wrote:

> On 25/03/15 07:58, Richard Fontana wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:34:13PM -0500, Anne Gentle wrote:
>>
>>> On guides where the output doesn't indicate a license but the source
>>> does; is
>>> that sufficient?
>>>
>>
>> Hi Anne,
>>
>> It might not be required but it seems preferable to have an indication
>> of the license in the output too. Or at least some general statement
>> about how guides are licensed by default, e.g. at docs.openstack.org
>> or perhaps via the web page footer.
>>
>>
> I think something in the footer is a good idea. Personally, it's where I'd
> start looking if I wanted that info.


Yep, all guides except contributor guides and one of the API guides has
license information on each page. This series of output pages:
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/ does not, but it can be added. That
would be another task I can take on if we consider it a requirement.

Anne

>
>
> L
>
> --
> Lana Brindley
> Technical Writer
> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> http://lanabrindley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>



-- 
Anne Gentle
annegentle at justwriteclick.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20150324/d260f494/attachment.html>