[OpenStack-docs] Usage of OmniGraffle
Christian Berendt
berendt at b1-systems.de
Thu Jan 8 09:43:20 UTC 2015
On 01/08/2015 09:26 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> * Is the additional complexity of differing 'source' and 'use' locations
> worthwhile?
I think so because at the moment all graphics (source and rendered) life
inside documentation repositories without any specific convention.
For example the graphics of image-guide are located in a directory
figures, the graphics of arch-design are located in a directory images.
Also there are a lot of screenshots out of date. This should be
discussed, too. There are tools like http://phantomjs.org/ to automate
screen capturing. This way we could keep screenshots up to date.
> * Is increasing the number of places needing to be changed for a fix
> justified?
We have a lot of documentation repostiories and at the moment it is hard
to find the source of a specific graphic or a specific graphic itself.
For example there is only one Graffle file in arch-design but a lot of
PNG files.
> * How will the changes be communicated? What HowToContribute guides
> needs to be updated?
This mailinglist and https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/HowTo.
Christian.
--
Christian Berendt
Cloud Solution Architect
Mail: berendt at b1-systems.de
B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
More information about the OpenStack-docs
mailing list