Open Stack

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:

> On 12/11/2015 05:04 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com
>> <mailto:aj at suse.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 12/10/2015 10:16 PM, Lana Brindley wrote:
>>
>>         -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>         Hash: SHA256
>>
>>         I think that will require a bug, if someone wants to take that on.
>>
>>
>>     A bug to implement a cross-project spec?
>>
>>     I don't think that's necessary,
>>
>>
>> We'll need some way to scope what it means for docs. Perhaps the spec
>> itself could serve for tracking and scope purposes. I don't know another
>> way to assign and track the docs tasks other than bugs or blueprints.
>>
>>
> Perhaps my understanding of cross-project specs is wrong. Should we -1 the
> cross project spec and ask to add sections for documentation?
>
> Or is it expected that for cross-project specs each projects tracks them
> on their own?


I'm reviewing the spec now and will request they add the doc details as
needed.

Yes, docs needs can be in the cross-project spec. We also need a docs
liaison to the cross project group who tracks theses and inserts docs needs
when appropriate. [1] And it's nearly always appropriate. Did we already
identify someone?

Anne

1.
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-December/080869.html


>
>
> Andreas
>
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>        HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
>


-- 
Anne Gentle
Rackspace
Principal Engineer
www.justwriteclick.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20151211/5fc0f564/attachment.html>