Thanks for doing this, Matt.
I was thinking that MySQL and Keystone, perhaps RabbitMQ need to be Priority 1 because almostall the other services use them. But I see that you set priorities from 1-9 -- finer granularity than I wasexpecting but probably a brilliant approach.
Perhaps we need a rough definition about what these priorities mean. It looks to me like the topicsmarked for priorities 1-3 are sine qua non for the guide and the priority 4 stuff may also be.
Why is Cinder priority 6 when Swift is priority 4?
I'm also thinking that priority 6 may be low for nova-compute.
These are just my first impressions -- what does everyone else think?
From: Matt Kassawara <mkassawara at gmail.com>
To: "openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 1:21 PM
Subject: [OpenStack-docs] [ha-guide] Prioritize content development
As per our meeting last week, I prioritized content development in the TOC [1]. I'm not quite sure about Trove and Sahara, but fairly certain they can wait until we complete most of the other content. Also, I probably can't make the meeting on Thursday, so please raise any issues with these priorities by Wednesday.
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HAGuideImprovements/TOC
Matt
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-docs mailing list
OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20150406/f09243bc/attachment.html>